Why are so many AI assistants female by default — and should we be worried about that?

1. AI Platforms & Assistants

Why are so many AI assistants female by default — and should we be worried about that? Features By Becca Caddy published 1 March 2026

How gender became baked into the sound and design of modern AI

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

(Image credit: Getty Images/NurPhoto)

• Copy link
• Facebook
• X
• Whatsapp
• Reddit
• Pinterest
• Flipboard
• Threads
• Email

Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Tech Radar Get the TechRadar Newsletter

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

You are now subscribed

Your newsletter sign-up was successful

An account already exists for this email address, please log in. Subscribe to our newsletter

Open ChatGPT and you can choose between different voices. Some feel obviously feminine, others masculine, and several are more neutral. They also have fairly neutral names too, like Ember, Sol and Juniper.

But it wasn’t always that way. For years, many AI-powered assistants arrived with a default setting: female. Although ChatGPT isn’t exactly the same kind of system as the early voice assistants that first entered our homes, think back to their names: Siri, Alexa, Cortana. Even when they weren’t explicitly gendered, the voices often were.

There might be more flexibility now, but many AI tools, chatbots and assistants still tend to skew female. And as humans, we have a strong tendency to anthropomorphize technology — to project personality, intention and even emotion onto it.

You may like

• The AI conversation is a mess — and that’s stopping us from making good decisions
• Jaron Lanier on how far our empathy should extend to AI
• I’ve spent months tracking AI personalities and we’re reading it wrong

But does it really matter? Absolutely. As AI becomes more embedded in daily life, decisions about how it sounds, its personality and its perceived gender, are important.

People don’t just ask these systems for the weather. They confide in them and rely on them for work. Some even abuse them. At the other end of the spectrum, some form deep emotional attachments to them. When conversational AI that can mean so much to us, is designed to sound human, and often specifically feminine, that choice can shape expectations about who serves, who assists and who holds authority.

Why did early AI assistants have female voices?

There isn’t one neat answer. Early voice assistants were developed at a time when much of the available speech data, including customer service recordings and telecommunications archives, was dominated by women’s voices. So that influenced early design and training decisions.

But helping roles were feminized long before they were digitized. Think telephone operators, secretaries and receptionists. Positions associated with assistance and emotional labor were historically performed by women, and those associations have proven to be really durable. Both in how tech companies have designed these products and in what we expect from them.

Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

This is partly why companies have often justified defaulting to a female voice by citing research suggesting people find female voices more pleasant, more trustworthy or easier to engage with. What I find fascinating is that yes, there is research that supports aspects of this, alongside the broader cultural context. But the findings are not definitive. Preferences are shaped by social norms, expectations about authority and care, and ideas about which voices “fit” particular roles in particular contexts.

There’s also a widely repeated claim that humans prefer female voices from infancy. Babies hear their mother’s voice in the womb, the argument goes, so we’re wired to respond positively to female voices.

But Kate Devlin, Professor of AI and Society in the Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London, challenges that narrative. In her book Turned On: Science, Sex and Robots, she writes:

You may like

• The AI conversation is a mess — and that’s stopping us from making good decisions
• Jaron Lanier on how far our empathy should extend to AI
• I’ve spent months tracking AI personalities and we’re reading it wrong

“The idea behind this is that babies respond to their mother ’s voice in the womb over all other voices. But isn’t that because, well, they’re inside their mother? I asked my friend, baby scientist Caspar Addyman, if this might be the case. ‘Babies do prefer female voices and faces,’ he told me. ‘But only in the first eight months or so. I’m not aware of any evidence for this beyond that period.’”

In other words, even if early preference exists, it may not explain adult behavior or how our preferences evolve over time.

More recent research further complicates the assumption that users strongly favor female assistants because they’re perceived as more trustworthy. A 2021 study found that while stereotyping can occur with gendered voice assistants, there were no significant differences in trust formed towards a gender-ambiguous voice versus a gendered voice. If trust doesn’t reliably hinge on femininity, the rationale for defaulting to it becomes harder to defend.

Media has played a role too. I’ve written before about how sci-fi influences how we treat AI today and many of our favorite sci-fi stories have long imagined AI in feminized forms. Think seductive operating systems, compliant digital companions, subservient robotic helpers. Male robots and AIs exist, of course, but the archetype of the “helpful female machine” persists.

If these defaults are rooted in older labor roles, inherited stereotypes and research that may no longer hold up across the board, why perpetuate them? Tech is rarely shy about reinvention. If we’re building the future, we could choose to build it differently and more equitably.

(Image credit: Getty Images/RICCARDO MILANI )

Why does it matter?

This might sound trivial to some people. It’s just a voice and users can change it now anyway, right? But the issue here isn’t just how AI sounds. It’s what it symbolizes, reinforces and the feedback loops it creates.

A 2024 study titled The femininization of AI-powered voice assistants explains: “This bias can manifest in several ways and at different levels, such as training data bias, inclusive design challenges, stereotyped responses that reinforce gender prejudice, female voice default, passive or submissive tone, poor handling of harassment, and insufficient range of diverse voice options.”

Research increasingly suggests that gendered technology doesn’t just mirror stereotypes but it can entrench them, shaping expectations about who serves, who assists and who holds authority.

Today, users have more choice. Many assistants and chatbots still default to a female voice, but male and gender-neutral options are increasingly available. However, at the time of writing, there are still no clear regulatory standards addressing gender stereotyping in AI design.

There’s more at stake than voice settings alone. Expanding genuinely neutral options is one step. Increasing gender diversity within AI development teams is another. Design decisions often reflect who is in the room. And despite the fact that more people than ever are using, and being shaped by, AI systems, women remain underrepresented in AI development. Recent estimates suggest they hold roughly 22–26% of AI-related roles worldwide, and under 15% of senior AI leadership roles.

So maybe more than anything, this is a reminder that technology shapes culture, and culture shapes technology in return. If we want more equitable systems, in AI and beyond, that loop is worth interrupting.

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

TOPICS AI Becca CaddySocial Links Navigation

Becca is a contributor to TechRadar, a freelance journalist and author. She’s been writing about consumer tech and popular science for more than ten years, covering all kinds of topics, including why robots have eyes and whether we’ll experience the overview effect one day. She’s particularly interested in VR/AR, wearables, digital health, space tech and chatting to experts and academics about the future. She’s contributed to TechRadar, T3, Wired, New Scientist, The Guardian, Inverse and many more. Her first book, Screen Time, came out in January 2021 with Bonnier Books. She loves science-fiction, brutalist architecture, and spending too much time floating through space in virtual reality. 

View More

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

Logout Read more The AI conversation is a mess — and that’s stopping us from making good decisions    Jaron Lanier on how far our empathy should extend to AI    I’ve spent months tracking AI personalities and we’re reading it wrong    How 5 2025 AI trends affected my life    Switching ChatGPT to voice makes for a much better experience on mobile    I asked a psychologist what worries the people trying to make AI safer    Latest in AI Platforms & Assistants Anthropic’s CEO isn’t sure if Claude AI is conscious.    Trump just banned Anthropic from government use — this is how we got here    Nano Banana 2 shows off its powerful image creation enhancements    I called Soulja Boy’s AI clone and had a surreal conversation    33% of millennials want to live on using AI    YouTube fixed its most abnormal bug — but there’s more to do    Latest in Features Everything we learned from the Pokémon Winds and Pokémon Waves official announcement trailer    I added a soundbar to my TV – and no longer think they're essential for every screen    The 3 best compact coffee makers for big flavor in a small package    School Spirits season 4 looks hopeful as star confirms story has 'mileage'    Bridgerton season 5 is 'pretty much done' and starts shooting 'very soon'    Why are so many AI assistants female by default?    LATEST ARTICLES

1. 1I tested Kodak's cheap and pocketable film camera, and it's packed with retro-futuristic charm
2. 2How to watch Man Utd vs Crystal Palace: Live Streams & TV Channels, Team News
3. 3More Apple Studio Display 2 details are rumored, with two models apparently on the way
4. 4IPVanish mobile app: features, price, how to install
5. 5'You can feel where the story is going': School Spirits star confirms hit Paramount+ show has more mileage as season 4 awaits renewal