Technology

Just the Stats: Penn State vs Rutgers

2025-11-26 13:01
466 views
Just the Stats: Penn State vs Rutgers

All the numbers behind this week’s final match up of the regular season!

Just the Stats: Penn State vs RutgersStory byCari GreeneWed, November 26, 2025 at 1:01 PM UTC·5 min readPenn St. Nittany Lions (5-6; 2-6 Big Ten) vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights (5-6; 2-6 Big Ten)3:30 p.m. ET, November 29—BTNSHI Stadium (Capacity: 52,454 / Piscataway, NJ)

Tableizer using codebeautify.org table.cb-tableizer { font-size: 12px; border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; } cb-tableizer td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #CCC; } .cb-tableizer th { background-color:#A0A2A3; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Penn State

Value (Nat’l Rank)

Value (Nat’l Rank)

Rutgers

Advantage

Rushing Offense (ypg)

166.4 (63)

201.7 (127)

Rushing Defense (ypg)

Passing Offense (ypg)

179.1 (112)

224.2 (75)

Passing Defense (ypg)

Pass Efficiency

134.41 (66)

156.96 (128)

Pass Efficiency Defense

Total Offense (ypg)

345.5 (99)

425.9 (117)

Total Defense (ypg)

Push

Scoring Offense (ppg)

31.0 (45)

31.09 (T – 114)

Scoring Defense (ppg)

Rushing Defense (ypg)

146.8 (T – 63)

169.6 (T – 49)

Rushing Offense (ypg)

Passing Defense (ypg)

169.5 (17)

259.5 (35)

Passing Offense (ypg)

Push

Pass Efficiency Defense

124.83 (48)

141.88 (54)

Pass Efficiency

Push

Total Defense (ypg)

395.6 (60)

Total Offense (ypg)

Scoring Defense (ppg)

20.09 (T – 26)

28.0 (68)

Scoring Offense (ppg)

Punt Return Defense (ypr)

8.0 (70)

18.2 (5)

Punt Return Yds (ypr)

Punt Return Yds (ypr)

8.11 (81)

11.8 (109)

Punt Return Defense (ypr)

Net Punting Yds (ypp)

41.91 (20)

41.55 (24)

Net Punting Yds (ypp)

Push

Kickoff Return Yds (ypr)

20.28 (79)

19.84 (65)

Kickoff Return Defense (ypr)

Push

Kickoff Return Defense (ypr)

21.44 (83)

21.0 (T – 62)

Kickoff Return Yds (ypr)

Push

Turnover Margin

+.18 (T – 52)

+.09 (T – 61)

Turnover Margin

Passes Had Intercepted (total)

7 (42)

5 (T – 111)

Passes Intercepted (total)

Passes Intercepted (total)

6 (T – 93)

7 (T – 42)

Passes Had Intercepted (total)

Penalty Yds/Game

36.0 (10)

31.73 (5)

Penalty Yds/Game

Push

Sacks (spg)

2.27 (T – 43)

3.18 (T – 123)

Sacks Allowed (spg)

Sacks Allowed (spg)

1.45 (T – 34)

.91 (T – 132)

Sacks (spg)

Tackles for Loss (tpg)

6.2 (T – 35)

5.82 (T – 98)

Tackles for Loss Allowed (tpg)

Tackles for Loss Allowed (tpg)

4.82 (T – 40)

3.9 (T – 124)

Tackles for Loss (tpg)

Redzone Offense (% season)

89.1% (T – 37)

88.6% (110)

Redzone Defense (% season)

Redzone Defense (% season)

82.5% (T – 54)

78.0% (T – 109)

Redzone Offense (% season)

Redzone TD % (season)

69.57%

72.73%

Redzone TD % Defense (season)

Redzone TD % Defense (season)

55.0%

60.0%

Redzone TD % (season)

3rd Down Conv. % (season)

43.4% (T – 39)

42.5% (99)

3rd Down Defense % (season)

3rd Down Defense % (season)

41.1% (90)

42.0% (T – 48)

3rd Down Conv. % (season)

4th Down Conv. % (season)

59.3% (47)

66.7% (T – 118)

4th Down Defense % (season)

4th Down Defense % (season)

50.0% (T – 42)

65.6% (21)

4th Down Conv. % (season)

Push

1st Downs (season)

213 (T – 89)

226 (T – 80)

1st Downs Allowed (season)

Push

1st Downs Allowed (season)

186 (T – 19)

252 (26)

1st Downs (season)

Push

Time of Possession (mpg)

29 (82)

32 (15)

Time of Possession (mpg)

Strength of Schedule

43

30

Strength of Schedule

Push

Tableizer using codebeautify.org table.cb-tableizer { font-size: 12px; border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; } cb-tableizer td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #CCC; } .cb-tableizer th { background-color:#A0A2A3; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Difference

> 25

in

National Rank

Difference

> 50

in

National Rank

Difference

> 75

in

National Rank

Difference

> 100

in

National Rank

Note:

All of the above rankings are taken directly from the NCAA except for strength of schedule, which is taken from Power Rankings.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

The Redzone TD% and Redzone TD% Defense are calculated by me and not ranked by the NCAA. Determining who has the advantage in these categories is strictly my arbitrary judgment.

Quick thoughts:

For the second week in a row, the Nittany Lions’ rankings in nearly every stat got better. No surprise, as they took on a good Nebraska team and absolutely dominated them; last week’s win wasn’t a fluke, and the scores weren’t on tricky plays or even turnovers. It was a methodical win, dominating both lines of scrimmage. And though this week is on the road for Penn State, unlike last week’s game, the opponent isn’t as complete of a team, despite having their mobile starting quarterback still playing.

Rutgers is, just like PSU, playing for the post season this week, but they’re not the same team they’ve been in previous years, as defense-first as Greg Schiano otherwise might prefer. The most dangerous thing about this game is the scrambling ability of the quarterback, but if the Nittany Lions play like they have been the last three weeks, their season should be able to be extended.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

A little bit more behind these stats:

  • Penn State’s fourth down defense had the best single-week increase I can remember between MSU and Nebraska, elevating over 50 spots in the rankings off a few key red zone stops (including a game-starting impressive goal line stand)

  • The Nittany Lions have attempted conversions on 27 fourth downs, and gotten the conversion on 16 of those attempts; the Scarlet Knights have attempted 32 conversions, and succeeded on 21 of those attempts

  • PSU’s defense has faced 28 fourth down conversion attempts and allowed conversions on 14 of them – compared to RU’s defense facing just 12 attempts, and allowing conversions on 8 of them

  • Penn State has had 46 red zone trips on offense, resulting in 32 touchdowns and 9 field goals. Rutgers has had 50 trips, resulting in 30 touchdowns and 9 field goals

  • The Nittany Lion defense moved up in the red zone rankings almost 40 spots, having allowed 40 red zone trips, off which their opponents have scored 22 touchdowns and 11 field goals. The Scarlet Knight defense has allowed 44 trips, with opponents scoring 32 touchdowns and 7 field goals

  • PSU has returned 18 punts, while RU has only returned 5. Penn State’s opponents have only returned 9 punts on the season, while Rutgers’ opponents also have only attempted 5 returns

  • The Nittany Lions have returned 18 kickoffs, while the Scarlet Knights have returned just 9. On the flip side, PSU has faced 16 kickoff returns, while RU has faced 19.

What say you all?

AdvertisementAdvertisement